Beyond binary form in Åse’s Death


One thing I have never really liked about some theory, analytical, and pedagogical composition books that deal with form is how they present it.

They will often tell you that a piece uses ternary form. Or sonata form. Or, as we discovered with Grieg last week: binary form in Åse’s Death.

This week's annotated score/analysis: Arrangement - Åse's Death.pdf


The Problem with How Form Is Often Taught

However, for the student, this can create false understandings, misconceptions, and misinterpretations.

Because so often these forms are reduced to something like:

Ternary: ABA
One idea, a contrasting idea, and a return of the original idea.

Sonata: exposition, development, recapitulation
One or two ideas, those ideas are developed, and then they return.

Binary: AB
One idea, followed by a contrasting idea
(which, as we discussed last week, is not always accurate).


Where the Real Composition Happens

Yet, the real composition often happens within these sections.

An A and B section of a ternary form can contain multiple iterations of an idea: sometimes repeated directly, sometimes subtly varied.

Similarly (and slightly off topic for today, though we will come to this next week), a book might say that an idea is “developed” in a sonata form.

Well… care to elaborate?

How does Beethoven actually develop his ideas?

Do you really know?

Have you analysed the piece, or not?


This Week: Looking Inside the Structure

To make sure I do not leave you feeling this way (following last week's analysis of overall form), this week I would like to look at the internal structure, or what I call the arrangement, of Grieg’s Åse’s Death.

If you open the PDF below, you will see a more heavily annotated score than last week.

Arrangement - Åse's Death.pdf

While it still includes the binary markers (A and B), I have added further annotations in the form of: T1-1, T1-2, and so on

Alongside this, there is a table that breaks down the arrangement of the composition in a more structured way.

This is something I may elaborate on further in the coming weeks as we move into smaller and smaller musical units.


The A Section

As you will see, each section contains multiple iterations of its theme.

T1-1
8-bar main A melody

T1-2
A full repetition of the melody, transposed up a 5th into F♯ minor

T1-1’
A return of the opening A melody

This is quite straightforward.

The transposition creates a simple modulation to the dominant minor and uses the same approach Grieg employs in Morning Mood: varying material through transposition rather than rewriting it.


The B Section

The B section follows a similar idea, but in 4-bar units:

T2-1
4-bar presentation of the main B melody, ending in B minor

T2-2
Repetition of the melody, transposed down a 5th, ending in F♯ major

T2-1’
Return of T2-1

T2-2’
Return of T2-2

T2-2 (f, a)
To close, Grieg liquidates the melody through fragmentation (taking the ascending cadential motif), and eventually augments it before cadencing in B minor to end the movement


A Simple Form, Richly Used

The overall effect is one of great economy within a simple design.

This is not simply A (one theme) and B (another contrasting theme), but rather two sections built from carefully varied iterations of their material.


A Missing Layer (For Now)

One important aspect not captured here is orchestration and dynamics.

We will return to these in a later week.


Next Week

Next week we will take a closer look at the melodies themselves:

How they are structured
And how they are composed


Questions or Comments?

As always, if you have any questions or thoughts, I would be delighted to hear them: please do get in touch.

All the best,

George

P.S. If you are curious about the full course, you can preview it here for a reasonable price: https://www.udemy.com/course/music-composition-with-grieg-orchestration-melody-form/?couponCode=5ADB3DAED3790066DC12.

P.S.S. If you have had enough of hearing from me, please unsubscribe using the link below, cheers and cheerio:

Any Old Music

Hello. My name is George Marshall and I am the founder of Any Old Music. I am a composer with over 10-years of experience, having completed work on 50+ projects for video-games, films and the concert hall. In 2020, I completed my doctorate in Music Composition. My PhD was on constraint and how it emerges in creative projects. For example, team discussions in video-game projects. If a video-game team presented a mood-board and certain briefs, these constrain and challenge the composer to compose in a particular way or style. Less quantifiable than, say, the application of serialism, but probably just as (if not more) constraining and creatively directing. It was during my PhD that I realised that there would only be two outcomes for me as a composer: I became a professional composer who needed to compose lots of music in not enough time. I became an amateur/hobbyist or semi-professional composer who needed to compose less music but still with not enough time. With this in mind I eventually opted for something more along the lines of semi-professional, but with an ambition of setting up Any Old Music as a means of helping similarly time strapped music makers. Particularly those in the second group, the hobbyists and semi-professionals, whose composing competes much more for time against other aspects of life. Composition is incredibly rewarding. You never stop learning and developing as a composer. Furthermore, many of us boast renegade autodidactic personalities to a certain extent. My hope is that Any Old Music’s self-paced composition courses can help composers to continue growing, by learning through creating and doing so in their own time.

Read more from Any Old Music

I've found myself watching quite a lot of World Cup coverage over the last few weeks. Not so much the football itself (beyond En-gur-laaand!), if I'm honest, but the discussion around it. One programme I almost always watch during international tournaments is The Overlap: Stick to Football, and recently they were discussing England winger Noni Madueke's performances. During the conversation, Gary Neville made a point that struck me as being relevant far beyond football. There's a common...

Over the past few weeks, we have explored the form, melodies, motifs, and transpositions that make up Åse's Death. Today I would like to turn to the harmony. Yet rather than beginning with the specifics and theory--Italian 6ths and secondary dominants--I would like to begin with a question. What if Grieg's music is doing more than expressing grief? A crossroads At this point in the play, Peer finds himself at a crossroads. His mother has died. He has been shunned by the community in which he...

One of the recurring themes in this series has been Grieg's economy of means. Repeatedly, we find him achieving more with less. If you are joining this series partway through, we have already explored: The binary form of the movement The arrangement of its themes The phrase structure of Melody 1 The motivic construction of Melody 2 Today I would like to look at one of the principal techniques Grieg uses to extend his material: transposition. Transposition and modulation in Åse’s Death More of...